Enhancing mediation processes in matrimonial property disputes in Malaysia through artificial intelligence
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mediation has become an essential mechanism in resolving family disputes in Malaysia, particularly in matrimonial property cases under both civil and Syariah legal systems. However, current mediation practices face challenges such as delays, emotional distress, and power imbalances. This article adopts a doctrinal legal analysis to examine the statutory and institutional foundations of mediation in matrimonial property disputes. It further explores the potential of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in mediation within the legal framework to address procedural inefficiencies, enhance access to justice, and support equitable outcomes. By analysing relevant legislation and regulatory gaps, this study proposes hybrid models of mediation and legal reforms for AI-assisted mediation that is aligned with Malaysia’s dual legal structure.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abuzar, M., & Shah, Q. (2025). AI-enhanced online dispute resolution for family disputes: Examining global trends,
models, mechanisms, and ethical challenges in Pakistan. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3, 1766
https://doi.org/10.59075/chm5qd21
Alessa, H. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in online dispute resolution: A brief and critical overview.
Information & Communications Technology Law, 31(3), 319-342.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088060
Australian Government. (2020). AI ethics principles. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources.
Australian Law Reform Commission. (2019). Family law for the future: An inquiry into the family law system (Report
No. 135). https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/family-law-report-135/
Azahari, R. (2010). The development of family mediation in Malaysian Muslim society. European Journal of Social
Sciences, 18, 220-230.
Beattie, S., & Mackenzie, D. (2021). Algorithmic justice in family disputes: A New Zealand perspective. New Zealand
Law Journal.
Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J., & Neves, J. (2013). Using case-based reasoning and principled
negotiation to provide decision support for dispute resolution. Knowledge and Information Systems, 36(3), 789
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-012-0563-0
FairWay Resolution Ltd. (2020). Annual report. https://www.fairwayresolution.com
Fatima, N. (2023). From courtrooms to algorithms: The evolution of dispute resolution with AI. Revista Brasileira de
Alternative Dispute Resolution, 5(10), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.52028/RBADR.V5I10.ART13.IN
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. (2021). Practice direction no. 1 of 2021: Electronic filing and virtual
hearings. https://www.fcfcoa.gov.au
Hamid, A. G., & Trakic, A. (2015). The legal system of Malaysia. CLJ Publication.
Kattnig, M., Angerschmid, A., Reichel, T., & Kern, R. (2024). Assessing trustworthy AI: Technical and legal perspectives
of fairness in AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, 106053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106053
Khan, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) in business mediation: A tool to empower mediators. International Journal
of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i6/25394
Leow, L. P. (2024). Awareness and perception of alternative dispute resolution methods in Penang. Issues and
Perspectives in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.33093/ipbss.2024.4.1.3
Issues and Perspectives in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 6 (No. 2), pp. 453-468.
Mohd Nasir (2026)
Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2010). Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology.
Cambridge University Press.
Md Sayuti, M. N., Ahmad, N., & Mutalib, L. A. (2020). The practice of sulh in Malaysian Syariah courts: Challenges and
prospects. Journal of Islamic Law Review, 16(1), 123-145.
Milisauskaite, J., & Sondaite, J. (2022). Family dispute resolution practitioners' subjective experience and attitude on
compulsory family mediation in Australia. Acta Prosperitatis, 13, 90-112. https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077
-13-90-112
Mohsen Soori, M., Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., Dastres, R., & Arezoo, B. (2024). AI-based decision support systems in
Industry 4.0: A review. Journal of Economy and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.08.005
New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2016). Family justice reform evaluation. https://www.justice.govt.nz
Nordin, N., Aziz, A. A., & Ahmad, S. (2021). Digitalising the Syariah court: A necessity for future dispute resolution.
Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 210-225.
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.702
Nur Farahiyah Mohd Nasir, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Shamsuddin Suhor, & Muhamad Helmi Md. Said. (2022). Mediation
and online mediation in family disputes in Malaysia: A comparative study. International Journal of Business and
Globalisation, 30(3/4), 303-314.
Osasona, F., Amoo, O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T., Farayola, O., & Ayinla, B. (2024). Reviewing the ethical implications
of AI in decision-making processes. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6, 322
https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773
Rahmat, N. E., Randawar, D. K., Mohd Nor, A., & Hussain, F. (2022a). Certification and mediation training for
mediators in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11).
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i11.1945
Rahmat, N. E., Mohd Zain, M., Saripan, H., Randawar, D., & Othman, M. (2022b). Mediation as an alternative
mechanism to resolve family disputes in Malaysia: A comparative analysis with Australia and New Zealand.
Intellectual Discourse, 30. https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v30i2.1818
Rasool, E., Abadi, H., Muller Stuart, M., & Adolfo, E. (2024). Guide to peacemaking using Islamic principles:
Commonalities between international norms and Islamic principles. Folke Bernadotte Academy.
Rule, C. (2024). Online dispute resolution for family disputes. In Family dispute resolution: Process and practice (pp.
-133). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197545904.003.0006
Suarez Xavier, P. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence, ADR and ODR: A perspective within the Spanish legal system.
Revista Eletronica de Direito Processual, 25(3), 630-658. https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86626
Sukindar, K. H., Sarikun, Pasaribu, B. K., & Sahmat, M. S. B. (2024). Legal innovation in religious courts: The potential
utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) in resolving contemporary cases. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(2),
-410. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.8199
Tajuddin, N. A., Abdul Hak, N., & Ibrahim, B. (2018). The evaluation of indirect contribution in matrimonial property
claims: A comparative study. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 3(13), 56-68.
Tanifum, N., & Sundjo, F. (2024). The importance of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution method. IQ
Research Journal, 3(12), 1-19.
Wilson-Evered, E., & Zeleznikow, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and online family dispute resolution. Law,
Governance and Technology Series, 45, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_2
Zeleznikow, J. (2017). Can artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in
courts? International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.223
Zeleznikow, J. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to enhance the effectiveness of online dispute resolution.
International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 7(1), 3-20.
Zeleznikow, J. (2021). Using artificial intelligence to provide intelligent dispute resolution support. Group Decision
and Negotiation, 30(4), 789-812.
Zuraidah, A., Norliah, I., Zuhairah, A. A. G., & Shariffah, N. A. S. N. (2021). Law of trust and the beneficial interest in
matrimonial property. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(S2), 105-117.