Resolving travel agency disputes: integrating artificial intelligence in online mediation

Main Article Content

Nur Farahiyah Mohd Nasir
Wan Farahiyah Izni W Abd Rahman

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of online travel transactions has elevated the risk of consumer disputes. Traditional litigation proves inadequate due to jurisdictional complexities, cost, and procedural delays. This article examines the legal and regulatory implications of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanisms for travel agency disputes. Using a doctrinal legal methodology, the study analyses statutory frameworks, international instruments, and comparative regulatory models, with particular reference to Malaysia and the European Union. The findings reveal that while AI-driven ODR offers efficiency and accessibility, doctrinal reform is necessary to prevent the erosion of consumer rights. The article’s original contribution lies in proposing a hybrid AI–human mediation framework that preserves algorithmic efficiency while safeguarding fairness, transparency, and accountability.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohd Nasir, N. F., & W Abd Rahman, W. F. I. (2026). Resolving travel agency disputes: integrating artificial intelligence in online mediation. Issues and Perspectives in Business and Social Sciences (IPBiS), 6(3), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.33093/pbss.2026.6.3.3
Section
Research papers

References

Alessa, H. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in online dispute resolution: A brief and critical overview. Information & Communications Technology Law, 31, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088060

Brand, R. A. (2023). UNCITRAL, access to justice, and the future of online dispute resolution. BCDR International Arbitration Review, 8, 87-105.

Briggs, A. (2019). Private international law in English courts. Oxford University Press.

Coglianese, C., & Lai, A. (2021). Algorithm versus bureaucracy: The role of artificial intelligence in administrative decision-making. Administrative Law Review, 73(1), 1-35.

Cortes, P. (2017). Consumer redress: From public enforcement to alternative dispute resolution. In The law of consumer redress in an evolving digital market: Upgrading from alternative to online dispute resolution (pp. 16-42). Cambridge University Press.

Emam, H. E. E. M., & Mohammed Abdelaal, F. (2021). Factors influencing intentions in hotel booking through online travel intermediaries applications. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality, 21(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaauth.2021.91968.1229

Isaac, E. (2024). Effectiveness of online dispute resolution platforms in managing e-commerce disputes. European Journal of Conflict Management, 4(1), 1-11.

Jevtic, J., Tomic, S., & Lekovic, K. (2020). Customer experience in the tourism industry: Determinants influencing complaint behaviour. Hotel and Tourism Management, 8(2), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.5937/menhottur2002025J

Jun, S. (2021). Consumer-friendly online dispute resolution platform. Journal of Consumer Policy Studies, 17(2), 29-60.

McKendrick, E. (2024). Contract law: Text, cases, and materials (10th ed.). Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2011). OECD consumer policy toolkit. OECD.

Radanliev, P. (2025). AI ethics: Integrating transparency, fairness, and privacy in responsible AI systems. Journal of Ethical AI and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2025.2463722

Rajendra, J. B., & Thuraisingam, A. S. (2022). The deployment of artificial intelligence in alternative dispute resolution: The AI augmented arbitrator. Information & Communications Technology Law, 31(2), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2021.1998955

Riepin, P. (2024). Can artificial intelligence and modern technologies address the common issues of consumer online dispute resolution in the EU? Teise, 130, 111-128. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2024.130.10

Rule, C. (2020). Online dispute resolution and the future of justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-043049

Sourdin, T. (2021). Judge v robot? Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Stone, R., & Devenney, J. (2022). The modern law of contract (16th ed.). Routledge.

Tan, J., Westermann, H., Pottanigari, N. R., Savelka, J., Meeus, S., Godet, M., & Benyekhlef, K. (2024). Robots in the middle: Evaluating LLMs in dispute resolution. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.07053

UNCITRAL. (2017). Technical notes on online dispute resolution. United Nations. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/odr/technicalnotes/odr

Westermann, H., Savelka, J., & Benyekhlef, K. (2023). LLMediator: GPT-4 assisted online dispute resolution. AI for Access to Justice Workshop at ICAIL 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.16732

Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505-523.

Zeleznikow, J. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to enhance the effectiveness of online dispute resolution. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 7(1), 3-20.

Zeleznikow, J. (2021). Using artificial intelligence to provide intelligent dispute resolution support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30, 789-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09734-1

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.