Path To a Healthy Work-Life Balance: Mobile Application for Work and Personal Life Mastery
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Drawing insights from diverse organizational methods, this study endeavors to facilitate effective self-development and organization in the face of contemporary demands as solutions for integrating goal tracking, event coordination, and task management within a unified calendar framework in a mobile application. There are three primary objectives of this study: firstly, to explore essential functionalities crucial for addressing the multifaceted challenges of modern life; secondly, to design and develop a mobile application that seamlessly integrates these functionalities; and finally, to evaluate the usability of the application through rigorous testing and feedback mechanisms. Envisaged deliverables include a fully functional mobile application designed to operate on the Android platform. Guided by the principles of agile software development, this study emphasizes continuous improvement and responsiveness to user needs throughout the development process. By adopting an iterative approach, the study aims to ensure the highest quality outcome, thereby enhancing the user experience and maximizing the application's efficacy in promoting work-life balance. Through this comprehensive approach, this study seeks to contribute to the ongoing discourse on work-life balance and offer practical solutions to individuals grappling with the complexities of modern living. By bridging the gap between organizational tools and personal development strategies, this study aspires to empower users in their pursuit of a harmonious and fulfilling lifestyle with a mobile application.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JIWE are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Readers are allowed to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use;
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes;
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
References
K. Rashmi and A. Kataria, “Work-life balance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, vol. 42, no. 11/12, pp. 1028–1065, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-06-2021-0145.
F. Sarwar, S. A. Panatik, M. S. Mohamad Sukor, and N. Rusbadrol, “A job demand-resource model of satisfaction with work-family balance among academic faculty: Mediating roles of psychological capital, work-to-family conflict, and enrichment,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 21582440211006142, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211006142.
N. P. Rothbard, A. M. Beetz, and D. Harari, “Balancing the scales: A configurational approach to work-life balance,” Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 8, pp. 73–103, 2021, doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-061833.
L. Bellmann and O. Hübler, “Working from home, job satisfaction and work-life balance—Robust or heterogeneous links?” Int. J. Manpower, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 424–441, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0458.
A. Gragnano, S. Simbula, and M. Miglioretti, “Work-life balance: Weighing the importance of work-family and work-health balance,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 907, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030907.
J. Leitão, D. Pereira, and Â. Gonçalves, “Quality of work life and organizational performance: Workers’ feelings of contributing, or not, to the organization’s productivity,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 20, p. 3803, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203803.
Y. Ahmetoglu, D. P. Brumby, and A. L. Cox, “To plan or not to plan? A mixed-methods diary study examining when, how and why knowledge work planning is inaccurate,” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 4, no. CSCW3, p. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3432921.
N. I. Edeh, F. N. Ezebuiro, A. L. Okute, C. L. Nwadi, and E. P. Ugwunwoti, “Mediation roles of transformational leadership and psychological empowerment on work-life balance and in-role performance of vocational educators in Nigeria,” J. Tech. Educ. Train., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2024.
J. Wajcman, “The digital architecture of time management,” Sci. Technol. Human Values, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 315–337, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0162243918795041.
J. Wajcman, “How Silicon Valley sets time,” New Media Soc., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1272–1289, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1461444818820073.
K. Salehzadeh Niksirat, L. Velykoivanenko, N. Zufferey, M. Cherubini, K. Huguenin, and M. Humbert, “Wearable activity trackers: A survey on utility, privacy, and security,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1–40, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3645091.
S. Wendel, Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics. O’Reilly Media, 2020.
A. Mehra, J. Paul, and R. P. S. Kaurav, “Determinants of mobile apps adoption among young adults: Theoretical extension and analysis,” J. Mark. Commun., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 481–509, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13527266.2020.1725780.
“Google Play Store,” Apr. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.habitnow.
“To-Do List - Schedule Planner, Daily Planner & Reminders,” Apr. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=todolist.scheduleplanner.dailyplanner.todo.reminders.
“Habit Tracker - Habit Diary, Tickit Daily Planner,” Apr. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=habittracker.todolist.tickit.daily.planner.
S. Bødker, Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. CRC Press, 2021, doi: 10.1201/9781003063971.
T. Kaya, R. Öztürk, and C. A. Gumussoy, “Usability measurement of mobile applications with system usability scale (SUS),” in Ind. Eng. Big Data Era, 2018, pp. 389–400, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03317-0_32.
V. Cotton and M. S. Patel, “Gamification use and design in popular health and fitness mobile applications,” Am. J. Health Promot., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 448–451, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0890117118790394.
P. Bitrián, I. Buil, and S. Catalán, “Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 132, pp. 170–185, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.028.
E. V. Eikey, “Effects of diet and fitness apps on eating disorder behaviours: Qualitative study,” BJPsych Open, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e176, 2021, doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1011.
V. Hema et al., “Scrum: An effective software development agile tool,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 981, no. 2, p. 022060, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/981/2/022060.
“How to interpret a system usability scale (SUS) score,” MeasuringU, Apr. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://measuringu.com/interpret-sus-score.
P. B. Toolaroud, E. Nabovati, M. Mobayen, H. Akbari, A. Feizkhah, R. Farrahi, and F. R. Jeddi, “Design and usability evaluation of a mobile-based self-management application for caregivers of children with severe burns,” Int. Wound J., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2571–2581, 2023, doi: 10.1111/iwj.14127.
G. D. Rembulan, "Evaluation and improvement of e-grocery mobile application user interface design using usability testing and human-centered design approach," J. Sist. Inform. Teknol., pp. 41–45, 2023.
Y. Xu, J. Wang, Z. Li, and W. Chen, “Design and application of experience management tools from the perspective of customer perceived value: A study on the electric vehicle market,” World Electr. Veh. J., vol. 15, no. 8, p. 378, 2024, doi: 10.3390/wevj15080378.
M. Schrepp, J. Kollmorgen, and J. Thomaschewski, “A comparison of SUS, UMUX-LITE, and UEQ-S,” J. User Exp., vol. 18, no. 2, 2023.
W.-H. Cheah, P. K. Tan, and M. A. Ali, “Mobile technology in medicine: Development and validation of an adapted system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire and modified technology acceptance model (TAM) to evaluate user experience and acceptability of a mobile application in MRI safety screening,” Indian J. Radiol. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2023, doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_900_22.
Y. F. Lim, S. C. Haw, K. W. Ng, and E. A. Anaam, “Hybrid-based recommender system for online shopping: A review,” J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Pract., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.33093/jetap.2023.5.1.3.
K. V. Perumal and S. P. Thiagarajah, “Enhancement of undergraduate time management through the use of a lab schedule reminder app,” J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Pract., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–37, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.33093/jetap.2019.1.1.30.