Debt Financing Cost and Green Innovation: The Conditioning Role of Financing Dependence Structure in Chinese Manufacturing Firms DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2026.7.2.14

Main Article Content

Hongzhuo Chen
Mohd Faizal Basri
Hazianti Abdul Halim

Abstract

Debt-financing costs are generally considered to be restrictive for corporate innovation; however, their role in green innovation may be conditional rather than uniformly negative. Based on a sample of A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2023, this study examines whether this cost is related to green patenting and, more importantly, how this relationship varies with firms’ financing dependence structure. Green innovation can be reflected in the scale of total green patent applications and the depth of green invention applications. Based on the estimates, both indicators are positively correlated with the cost of debt, and the impact is relatively stronger for total applications. Higher debt costs do not necessarily hinder firms’ green transition. However, the moderation analysis indicates that this positive effect is not uniform either. It is weaker when the company uses more equity financing, but this evidence is limited; by contrast, it becomes stronger when firms rely more heavily on debt financing, especially for green invention patent applications. The evidence suggests that debt financing cost is not only a financial burden but may also play a conditional role in firms’ green innovation decisions. The novelty of this study is that it distinguishes between dependence on equity and debt financing and finds that the debt-cost-green innovation relationship differs between the two types of financing dependence. Therefore, the cost of debt financing may act as either a constraint or a form of external pressure, depending on how firms obtain external funds.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chen, H., Basri, M. F., & Abdul Halim, H. (2026). Debt Financing Cost and Green Innovation: The Conditioning Role of Financing Dependence Structure in Chinese Manufacturing Firms: DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2026.7.2.14. International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting, 7(2), 426–454. https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2026.7.2.14
Section
Management, Finance and Accounting

References

Aivazian, V. A., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). Debt maturity structure and firm investment. Financial Management, 34(4), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2005.tb00120.x

Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x

Chen, H., Basri, M. F., & Halim, H. A. (2025). Equity and debt financing dependence, green innovation, and the moderating role of financial reporting quality: Evidence from Chinese firms. Sustainability, 17(17), 7693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177693

China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2012, October 26). Guidelines for the industry classification of listed companies (2012 Revision). China Securities Regulatory Commission. https://www.csrc.gov.cn/csrc_en/c102034/c1371375/content.shtml

Cornaggia, J., Mao, Y., Tian, X., & Wolfe, B. (2015). Does banking competition affect innovation? Journal of Financial Economics, 115(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.001

Diamond, D. W. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1086/261775

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Dong, X., Du, Y., & Xiao, X. (2025). How does China’s green factory policy affect substantive green innovation? PLOS One, 20(6), e0325438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325438

Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097

Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., & Poterba, J. M. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534426

Gao, D., Mo, X., Duan, K., & Li, Y. (2022). Can green credit policy promote firms’ green innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(7), 3911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073911

Giebel, M., & Kraft, K. (2024). R&D investments under financing constraints. Industry and Innovation, 31(9), 1141–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2024.2328008

Guo, R., & Zhao, J. (2024). CEO’s financial background and corporate green innovation. Sustainability, 16(10), 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104129

Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2

Hao, Y., & Wu, W. (2024). Rigid debt maturity structure and enterprise innovation. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104923

Hsu, P.-H., Tian, X., & Xu, Y. (2014). Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002

Hu, G., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 98, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134

Huang, X., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Zou, X., & Li, P. (2023). Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations. Ecological Economics, 204, 107684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107684

International Energy Agency. (2024). China: Energy system. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/countries/china

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

Liu, X., Wang, E., & Cai, D. (2019). Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 29, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014

Mitkov, Y. (2024). A theory of debt maturity and innovation. Journal of Economic Theory, 218, 105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2024.105828

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 559–586.

Shi, J., Yu, C., Li, Y., & Wang, T. (2022). Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on Chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121678

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2024, August 16). Green patents boost innovative growth. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202408/16/content_WS66bf0e2bc6d0868f4e8e9fc6.html

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

World Bank. (2024). Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)—China. World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS?locations=CN

Wu, S., Li, C., Huang, F., & Yu, Q. (2025). Exploration of the relationship between equity financing dependence, financing constraints, and corporate innovation performance. Finance Research Letters, 76, 107012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107012

Xiang, X., Liu, C., & Yang, M. (2022). Who is financing corporate green innovation? International Review of Economics & Finance, 78, 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.011

Xiong, X., Masron, T. A., & Gondo, T. W. (2023). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation of heavily polluting enterprises in China? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1076103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1076103

Yao, J., Qi, Y., & Guo, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, debt financing cost and enterprise innovation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 21909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26076-3

Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Xing, C. (2022). How does China’s green credit policy affect the green innovation of high polluting enterprises? The perspective of radical and incremental innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130387