Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems: Evidence from the United Kingdom, China and Malaysia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The advancement of artificial intelligence in the world can be observed through many aspects but less in the judicial system especially in Malaysia. Judicial system is often perceived as a sacred entity where it requires a vivid separation with the progressive of technologies. The problem arises from an increasing number of litigation cases that exceed the workforce and enforcement resources needed to handle them efficiently. As a result, justice can only be served after several years. The objective of this chapter is to analyse the application of artificial intelligence in the United Kingdom, China and Malaysia’s judicial system and how it provides a positive impact towards the country's judiciary through doctrinal legal research. It is observed that the application of artificial intelligence is less in the United Kingdom and Malaysia compared to China. Furthermore, it is found that there is a high possibility of incorporating artificial intelligence into the Malaysia judicial system through the machine learning system. In conclusion, the time has come for the revolution of artificial intelligence in the judicial system.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bharadiya, J. P. (2023). A comprehensive survey of deep learning techniques natural language processing. European Journal of Technology, 7(1), 58-66. https://ajpojournals.org/journals/EJT/article/view/1473/1597
Burgess, M. (2018, March 1). UK police are using AI to inform custodial decisions - but it could be discriminating against the poor. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/police-ai-uk-durham-hart-checkpoint-algorithm-edit/
Campbell, F. (2024, January 9). Insight: UK guidelines for the use of AI in courts and tribunals. Fieldfisher. https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/insights/uk-guidelines-for-the-use-of-ai-in-courts-and-tribunals-december-2023
Chen, Y., Wang, H., Yu, K., & Zhou, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence methods in natural language processing: A comprehensive review. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 85, 545-550. https://doi.org/10.54097/vfwgas09
Committee of Public Accounts. (2023). Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme (HC 1002, Sixty-First Report of Session 2022-23). UK Parliament. https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/40649/documents/198166/default/
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. (2023, July 18). Speech by the Master of the Rolls to the Bar Council of England and Wales. https://www.judiciary.uk/speech-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-to-the-bar-council-of-england-and-wales/
Cui, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence and judicial modernization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9880-4
Daud, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the Malaysian legal system: Issues, challenges and way forward. INSAF: The Journal of the Malaysian Bar, 39(1), 1-24. https://insaf.malaysianbar.org.my/ojs/index.php/jmr/article/view/13/1
Deng, J. (2019). Should the common law system welcome artificial intelligence: A case study of China's same-type case reference system. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 3(2), 223-280. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/should-the-common-law-system-welcome-ai-china-stcr/GLTR-05-2019/
Dina, N. Z., Ravana, S. D., & Idris, N. (2025). Legal judgment prediction using natural language processing and machine learning methods: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251329663
Fam, C. (2023, October 13). Budget 2024: RM20mil allocated to establish country's first AI faculty at University Technology Malaysia. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2023/10/13/budget-2024-rm20mil-allocated-to-establish-countrys-first-ai-faculty-at-university-technology-malaysia
Finder, S. (2023). How China's Supreme People's Court supports the development of foreign-related rule of law. China Law and Society Review, 8, 62-118. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v47i5.4361
Gulyamov, S., Khudoberganov, A., Sharopov, R., & Abduvaliev, B. (2023). Adapting legal systems to the development of artificial intelligence: Solving the global problem of AI in judicial processes. International Journal of Cyber Law, 1(4), 1-17. https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ijcl/article/download/49/35
HM Courts & Tribunals Service. (2018). The HMCTS reform programme. UK Government.
Hossain, M. B., Miraz, M. H., & Ya'u, A. (2024). From legality to responsibility: Charting the course for AI regulation in Malaysia. International Islamic University Malaysia Law Journal, 32(1), 397-429. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiumlj/index.php/iiumlj/article/view/927/475
Huang, Z. (2023). Judicial application of ecological remediation liability in EPIL: A commentary to the guiding cases, gazettes cases and model cases of the SPC in China. In X. Wang, X. Zhao, & N. McNamara (Eds.), Environmental public interest litigation in China (pp. 277-296). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26526-6_13
Hussain, T., & Anwer, S. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-making: A comparative legal analysis. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1), 1-6. https://contemporaryjournal.com/index.php/14/article/view/1181
Introducing AskAILA, Malaysia's first artificial legal assistant: An AI that specializes in labor law. (2020, December 11). MalaysiaKini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/announcement/554776
Jimenez-Gomez, C. E., & Cano Carrillo, J. (2022). Essential elements and ethical principles for trustworthy artificial intelligence adoption in courts. Trends in State Courts, 119, 119-130. https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/tech/id/1133/download
Judkins, A. (2023, December 13). UK publishes official guidance to judiciary on use of AI. Norton Rose Fulbright. https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/inside-disputes/blog/uk-publishes-official-guidance-to-judiciary-on-use-of-ai
Kassim, W. J. (2023). Overview perkhidmatan bantuan guaman di Malaysia: Isu, cabaran & way forward [PowerPoint slides]. Jabatan Bantuan Guaman. http://203.217.178.130/pdf/bantuanguaman/DOC-20230411-WA0014.pdf
Khalid, U. (2024). Natural language processing for legal document analysis: Automating judicial insights. Multidisciplinary Research in Computing Information Systems, 4(2), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.71465/mrcis70
Khan, M. A., & Ali, B. (2021). Electronic court system and speedy justice: A comparative critical analysis of legal systems in Pakistan, Malaysia, and India. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 3, 26-50. https://access.heinonline.com/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlspy2021&i=29
Khong, D. W. K., & Ho, C. C. (2022). Case commentary: Artificial intelligence in Malaysian courts: PP v Denis P Modili. Asian Journal of Law and Policy, 2(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.33093/ajlp.2022.9
Luo, J., & Kellogg, T. (2022, February 1). Verdicts from China's courts used to be accessible online. Now they're disappearing. ChinaFile. https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/viewpoint/verdicts-chinas-courts-used-be-accessible-online-now-theyre-disappearing
Lupo, G. (2019). Regulating (artificial) intelligence in justice: How normative frameworks protect citizens from the risks related to AI use in the judiciary. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 8(2), 75-96. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62463-8
Mahali, M., Fadzir, A. N. M., Azilan, N. E. N., Aziz, N. M., Hamdan, N. A. A. M., & Latif, N. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence as expert in the future: Issues and challenges under Section 45 of Malaysian Evidence Act 1950. Legal Network Series, 1((A)i), 1-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358995881_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AS_EXPERT_IN_THE_FUTURE_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES_UNDER_SECTION_45_OF_THE_MALAYSIAN_EVIDENCE_ACT_1950_2022_1_LNS_A_i_by_Mazlina_Mahali_et_al
Maliki, I. A., Ali, Z. Z., & Khusaini, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the law: The use of artificial intelligence as a tool to assist judges in deciding polygamy cases. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat, 23(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v23i2.20152
Manap, N. A., & Abdullah, A. (2020). Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: The two-tier approach. Universiti Utara Malaysia Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.11.2.2020.8779
Nhemi, S. (2023). Law without lawyers: Examining the limitations of consumer-centric legal tech services. Journal of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law, 3(1), 15-76. https://doi.org/10.52907/jipit.v3i1.223
Palladino, N. (2023). A digital constitutionalism framework for AI. Rivista di Digital Politics, 3(3), 521-542. https://doi.org/10.53227/113109
Papagianneas, S., & Junius, N. (2023). Fairness and justice through automation in China's smart courts. Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice, 51, art. 105897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105897
Patreliuk, D., Leonenko, M., Dekhtiarov, Y., Hadzhiieva, A. B., & Servetsky, I. (2024). The impact of using algorithmic systems on the criminal trial: International experience. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 1185-1198. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1185.1198
Prison Reform Trust. (2022). Offender management and sentence planning. https://prisonreformtrust.org.uk/adviceguide/offender-management-and-sentence-planning/.
Risk Management Assessment. (2002). Reducing serious harm. https://www.rma.scot/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Offender-Assessment-System-OASys-2.pdf
Rose, N. (2024, February 23). Completion of court modernisation programme delayed yet again. Legal Futures. https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/completion-of-court-modernisation-programme-delayed-yet-again
Rosili, N. A. K., Zakaria, N. H., Hassan, R., Kasim, S., Rose, F. Z. C., & Sutikno, T. (2021). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 10(4), 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v10.i4.pp1091-1102
Sanghvi, H., See, J. W. L., Tay, E. S., & Kuek, C. Y. (2022). Digitalisation of judiciary in Malaysia: Application of artificial intelligence in the sentencing process. In International Conference on Law and Digitalization (ICLD 2022) (pp. 91-97). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-59-6_9
Saud, A. (2024). Criminal liability about the use of artificial intelligence: Investigating the actus reus element of AI-driven technology. American Journal of Law, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1648
Shandilya, E., & Fan, M. (2024). Understanding older adults' perceptions and challenges in using AI-enabled everyday technologies. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (pp. 105-116). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565698.3565774
Sharifani, K., & Amini, M. (2023). Machine learning and deep learning: A review of methods and applications. World Information Technology and Engineering Journal, 10(7), 3897-3904. https://www.isireport.org/article/machine-learning-and-deep-learning-a-review-of-methods-and-applications
Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The smart court: A new pathway to justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367
Shore, D. (Creator). (2005-2006). House (Season 2) [TV series]. Heel & Toe Films; Bad Hat Harry Productions; NBC Universal Television Studio; Fox Broadcasting Company.
Srivastava, S. K. (2023). AI for improving justice delivery: International scenario, potential applications & way forward for India. Informatica, 47(5), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v47i5.4361
Stern, R. E., Liebman, B. L., Roberts, M. E., & Wang, A. (2022). Automating fairness? Artificial intelligence in the Chinese courts. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 59(3), 515-553. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2940
Sun, C. (2023, August 23). China's investment in AI expected to reach $38.1b in 2027. China Daily. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/347328
Tan, P. Y. (2023). The need for artificial intelligence in solving unsolved criminal cases and sentencing in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Law and Policy, 3(3), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.33093/ajlp.2023.7
Tang, M. (2025). History of the China's case guidance system and judicial reform. Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 31-74. http://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v8i1.29732
Themeli, E., & Philipsen, S. (2021). AI as the court: Assessing AI deployment in civil cases. In Justice, robotics and AI (pp. 213-232). Editions Themis. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3791553
Wang, N., & Tian, M. Y. (2022). Intelligent justice: AI implementations in China's legal systems. In A. Hanemaayer (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and its discontents (pp. 197-222). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88615-8_10
Xu, Z. (2022). Human judges in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), art. 2013652. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2013652
Yu, Z., & Dong, P. (2019). On practical exploration and development path of online dispute resolution system. China Legal Science, 7(4), 54-78. https://access.heinonline.com/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/chlegscien7&i=534
Yun, Y. X. (2026, February 2). e-Kehakiman system hit by technical glitch, manual filing temporarily required. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2026/02/02/e-kehakiman-system-hit-by-technical-glitch-manual-filing-temporarily-required
Zhabina, A. (2023, January 20). How China's AI is automating the legal system. DW. https://www.dw.com/en/how-chinas-ai-is-automating-the-legal-system/a-64465988