Vendor Evaluation and Selection for Forwarding Activities Using Stepwise Weight Assessment Analysis-Combined Compromise Solution (SWARA-CoCoSo) Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara Suku Cadang has faced delays in receiving commodities requested by the Perusahaan Listrik Negara Group, resulting in materials arriving later than expected. These materials were supplied by PT Wartsila, a partner of PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara Suku Cadang, responsible for fulfilling the orders placed by the Perusahaan Listrik Negara Group. To uphold its reliability as a supply chain company, PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara Suku Cadang must ensure timely delivery of requested goods. One way to minimize delays is through vendor evaluation. The SWARA method, which assesses ten factors identified by four logistics division experts, is employed to select the best forwarding vendor. The CoCoSo method, along with PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara Suku Cadang's logistics performance evaluation, was used to determine the top vendor. Based on the CoCoSo results, PT Kurnia Purnama Jaya ranked first with a score of 4.06, followed by Mats International Indonesia with a score of 2.6, Perigi Raja Terpadu in third with 1.5, and Pos Logistik Indonesia in fourth with 1.4. According to the CoCoSo method’s criteria weightings and vendor evaluation, PT Kurnia Purnama Jaya was selected as the most suitable vendor for PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara Suku Cadang.
Manuscript received: 19 Sep 2024 | Revised: 12 Dec 2024 | Accepted: 29 Dec 2024 | Published: 31 Mar 2025
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
M.S. Rohman, A.V. Vitianingsih, A.L. Maukar, S. Kacung and Pamudi, “Sistem Rekomendasi Prioritas Bantuan Industri Kecil dan Menengah (IKM) Dengan Metode AHP dan MOORA,” Teknika, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 212–219, 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34148/teknika.v12i3.681
P. Prusa, N. Mikusova, and H. Beckova, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Optimal In-House Storage Location Selection,” Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 18, 8241, 2024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188241
A.K. Kar and A.K. Pani, “Exploring the importance of different supplier selection criteria,” Management Research Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 89–105, 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2012-0230
H.B. Alyodya, J.K. Runtuk and P.K. Ng, “Implementation of The Best-Worst Method For Supplier Selection Of Products Transportation Service In A Pharmaceutical Company,” International Journal on Robotics, Automation and Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 33–42, 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/ijoras.2023.5.2.4
V. Shanmugam, and S. Meena. “Challenges Faced by Freight Forwarders in their Operations in Chennai City, Tamil Nadu” Asian Review of Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 6–8, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.1.1543
C. Palanisamy, "Smart manufacturing with smart technologies: A review," International Journal on Robotics, Automation and Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 85–88, 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/ijoras.2023.5.2.10
S.T. Huang, E. Bulut and O. Duru, “Service quality evaluation of international freight forwarders: an empirical research in East Asia.” Journal of Shipping and Trade, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0053-6
M. Mathew, R.K. Chakrabortty and M.J. Ryan, “Selection of an Optimal Maintenance Strategy Under Uncertain Conditions: An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 1121–1134, 2022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2977141
A.M. Abubakar, H. Elrehail, M.A. Alatailat and A. Elçi, “Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance,” Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 104–114, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
N. Munier, E. Hontoria and F. Jimenez-Saez, “Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Practical Guide for Complex Scenarios,” Vol. 275, Springer, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02726-1
J.J. Thakkar, “Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 336 Multi-Criteria Decision Making,” Vol. 336, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8
O. Pal, A.K. Gupta and R.K. Garg, “Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods in Supply Chains: A Review.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 2667 – 2673, 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1088140
A. Nursyahbani, A.N. Aisha, and Intan Permatasari, “Designing Vendor Performance Criteria Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method On The Engineering Procurement Construction Project Company” Jurnal Teknik Industri: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah dalam Bidang Teknik Industri, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 462 – 472, 2024.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jti.v10i2.32395
D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic , G. Popovic, and P. Stanimirovic, “A New Grey Approach for Using SWARA and PIPRECIA Methods in a Group Decision-Making Environment,” Mathematics, Vol. 9, No. 13, 1554.
DOI: https://10.3390/math9131554
C. Archetti and L. Peirano, “Air intermodal freight transportation: The freight forwarder service problem,’ Omega, Vol. 94, pp. 1 – 15, 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.02.009
M. Andrejic and V. Pajic, “Optimizing Personnel Selection in Transportation: An Application of the BWM-CoCoSo Decision-Support Model,” Journal of Organizations, Technology and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 35–46. 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56578/jote010103
D.T. Do and N.T. Nguyen, “Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process.” Strojnicky Casopis, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 15–40, 2022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2022-0014
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E.K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems.” Management Decision, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 2501–2519, 2019.