Host States’ Counterclaims on Human Rights in Practical Investment Arbitration

Main Article Content

Tho Thi Anh Nguyen

Abstract

This paper analyzes the potential hindrance to the positive results of counterclaims on human rights protection in the practical investment arbitration, then evaluates whether ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement and other treaties with investment provisions would be acceptable legal grounds to enable such counterclaims. This paper argues that to ensure more sustainable investment, future investment treaties should directly provide explicit states’ rights to make counterclaims on human rights protection. As such, these explicit provisions will create better legal grounds for host state to defend their legitimate rights on protecting human right, guarantee the predictability, and avoid the inconsistent interpretation or the reluctance of tribunals. This paper will delve in four substantial issues, including: (i) overview on counterclaims in international investment disputes; (ii) international and municipal regulations on human right protection in investment activities; (iii) host states’ counterclaims on protection of human rights in practical investment arbitration; (iv) control future commitments on states’ counterclaims on human rights.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nguyen, T. T. A. (2022). Host States’ Counterclaims on Human Rights in Practical Investment Arbitration. Asian Journal of Law and Policy, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.33093/ajlp.2022.5
Section
Articles

References

ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement (entered into force on 29 March 2012) (ACIA) art 34.4

African Union Comission's Draft Pan-African Investment Code, ch 4, arts 19-24

Antoine Goetz & Others and SA Affinage des Metaux v Republic of Burundi (ICSID Case No ARB/01/2, 21 June 2012)

Arbitration Rules (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) UN Doc A/31/98, 31st Session Supp No 17

Argentina-Japan Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed 1 December 2018) (Argentina-Japan BIT) art 25(14)

Argentina-Spain Bilateral Investment Treaty (entered into force 28 September 1992)

Argentina-United Arab Emirates Bilateral Investment Treaty, art 28(4)

Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union (BLEU)-Mozambique Bilateral Investment Treaty

Brazil-Malawi Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed on 25 June 2015) (Brazil-Malawi BIT)

Bruno Simma, 'Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights?' (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 577

Chile-Hong Kong, China SAR Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed 18 November 2016) (Chile-Hong Kong BIT) art 26(7)

Christoph H Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary: A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) 756

Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (signed on 8 March 2018) (CPTPP) art 19.9.2

Czech Republic-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty (entered into force 1 October 1992) (CR-Netherlands BIT)

David R Aven v Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No UNCT/15/3, Award 2018) para 693

European Union-Vietnam Investment Protection Agreement (signed 30 June 2019) (EUVIPA)

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v The Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No ARB/03/25, 2007)

Free Trade Agreement between The Government of The People's Republic of China and The Government of the Republic of Mauritius, art 8.24(4)

Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler and Michele Potesta, Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts: Current Framework and Reform Options (Springer Nature 2020) 7

Georgia-Japan Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed 29 January 2021) (Georgia-Japan BIT) art 23(15)

Hege Elisabeth Veeenstrat-Kjos, 'Counterclaims by Host States in Investment Treaty Arbitration' (2007) 4 Transnational Dispute Management 4

India-Kyrgyzstan Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed 14 June 2019) (India-Kyrgyzstan BIT) art 12

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Convention, (entered into force on 14 October 1966) (ICSID Convention) art 46

Investment Agreement for the COMESA Common Investment Area (signed 23 May 2007) (COMESA Investment Agreement) art 7(6)

Jan Paulsson, 'Arbitration Without Privity' (1995) 10 ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 232

Lucy Reed, Jan Paulsson and Nigel Blackaby, Guide to ICSID Arbitration (Kluwer Law International BV 2004) 35

M Douchin, 'Corporate Social Responsibility: Private Self-Regulation is Not Enough' [2002] 24 Private Sector Opinion <https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/6078df23-a976-4c1d-abb7-a71c3bcbe678/PSO24.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=jtCxiKA>

Marek St Korowicz, 'The Problem of the International Personality of Individuals' (1956) 50 The American Journal of International Law 533-562

Maritime International Nominees Establishment v Republic of Guinea (ICSID Case No ARB/84/4, Decision of the Ad hoc Annulment Committee 1989) para 8.01

Mexico-United Arab Emirates Bilateral Investment Treaty (entered into force 25 January 2018) (Mexico-UAE BIT) art 16

Michael Waibel, 'The Origins of Interpretive Canons in Domestic Legal Systems' in Joseph Klingler, Yuri Parkhomenko and Constantinos Salonidis (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018)

Myanmar's Anti-corruption Code of Ethics for Companies and Body Corporates (entered into force 1 August 2018)

Peru-Australia Free Trade Agreement (entered into force 11 February 2020) (PAFTA) art 8.24(8)

Pierre Lalive and Laura Halonen, 'On the Availability of Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration' in Alexander J Belohlavek and Nadezda Rozehnalova (eds), Czech Yearbook of International Law (2011) 141

R Rameau, 'The Pan-African Investment Code as a Model for Negotiation on the Investment Protocol to the Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area' (2021) 4 Transnational Dispute Settlement Management <https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/journal-advance-publication-article.asp?key=1874>

Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction over the Czech Republic's Counterclaim (UNCITRAL, 7 May 2004)

Spyridon Roussalis v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/1, Award 7 December 2011) paras 859-877

Ted Gleason, 'Examining Host-State Counterclaims for Environmental Damage in Investor-State Dispute Settlement from Human Rights and Transnational Public Policy Perspectives' (1 September 2021) 21 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 427-444

Teinver SA, Transportes de Cercanias SA and Autobuses Urbanos del Sur SA v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/09/1, Award 21 July 2017) para 1066

Texaco Overseas Petroleum Co/Cal Asiatic Oil Co v Government of the Libyan Arab Republic (Award 19 January 1977) para 47

The Southern African Development Community Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, art 15

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (signed 30 November 2018) (USMCA) art 14.D.7(8)

Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v The Argentine Republic, (ICSID Case No ARB/07/26, Award 2016) para 1151

Yarik Kryvoi, 'Counterclaims in Investor-State Arbitration' (2012) 21 Minnesota Journal of International Law 216, 252

Yasmine Lahlou, Rainbow Willard and Meredith Craven, 'The Rise of Environmental Counterclaims in Mining Arbitration' (18 June 2019) Global Arbitration Review <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-mining-arbitrations/1st-edition/article/the-rise-of-environmental-counterclaims-in-mining-arbitration>

Yasmine Lahlou, Rainbow Willard, Meredith Craven and Chaffetz Lindsey, 'The Rise of Environmental Counterclaims in Mining Arbitration' (31 July 2019) Lexology <https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bbc29b22-4e33-4d55-810f-296765e218d2>