Mesh Convergence Analysis on The Aerodynamic Performance of A Sedan Vehicle Manuscript Received: 27 January 2025, Accepted: 3 March 2025, Published: 15 March 2025, ORCiD: 0000-0001-9707-0782, https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2025.7.1.14

Article Sidebar

Article
Published: Mar 15, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2025.7.1.14
Keywords:
Frontal impact, Sedans, Drag coefficient, Mesh convergence, Processing time

Main Article Content

Afzatul Najwa Nor Azman
School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Kausalyah Venkatason
School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Shasthri Sivaguru
School of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot Watt University Malaysia, Precinct 5, Putrajaya, 62200 Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Abstract

This article performs a comprehensive mesh convergence analysis on the aerodynamic efficiency of sedan vehicles. Leading CAD and CFD tools, such as CATIA and ANSYS Fluent are used to model the geometry and run the aerodynamic simulations. The simulations are centred on evaluating the drag coefficient (Cd) for four different sedan profiles. A full scale and half scale profile model configuration were used to analyse and assess the simulations’ impact precision and computational efficiency. A thorough mesh sensitivity investigation is conducted to determine the effect and influence of the element sizing on Cd precision and processing time. The finding points to an element size of 0.5 m, as the optimal choice offering a balance between computational resource efficacy and precision on aerodynamic predictions. The full-scale model reduces the computational time significantly without compromising accuracy hence making it the selected choice for the aerodynamic simulations. The findings of this study underscore the importance of selecting an appropriate mesh element size for vehicle aerodynamic model. This study recommends a 0.5 m element size for future aerodynamic evaluations, thereby improving the equilibrium between simulation accuracy and computational cost in sedan aerodynamics.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2025.7.1
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

M. G. Connolly, A. Ivankovic and M. J. O’Rourke, “Drag Reduction Technology and Devices for Road Vehicles - A Comprehensive Review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. e33757, 2024.

B. C. Ismail and U. Ghia, “Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications,” J Fluids Eng., vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 078001, 2008.

M. Schlipf, A. Tismer and S. Riedelbauch, “On the Application of Hybrid Meshes in Hydraulic Machinery CFD Simulations,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Sci., vol. 49, pp. 062013, 2016.

M. L. Mohamad, M. T. A. Rahman, S. F. Khan, M. H. Basha, A. H. Adom and M. S. M. Hashim, “Design and Static Structural Analysis of A Race Car Chassis for Formula Society of Automotive Engineers (FSAE) Event,” J. Physics: IOP Conf. Series, vol. 908, pp. 012042, 2017.

A. R. Prabowo, B. Cao, J. M. Sohn and D. M. Bae, “Crashworthiness Assessment of Thin-Walled Double Bottom Tanker: Influences of Seabed to Structural Damage and Damage-Energy Formulae for Grounding Damage Calculations,” J. Ocean Eng. and Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 387–400, 2020.

A. Ghavidel, M. Rashki, H. G. Arab and M. A. Moghaddam, “Reliability Mesh Convergence Analysis by Introducing Expanded Control Variates,” Front. Structur.and Civ. Eng., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1012–1023, 2020.

C. Shah, “Mesh Discretization Error and Criteria for Accuracy of Finite Element Solutions,” Scribd, pp. 1-12, 2018.

A. Bespalov, A. Haberl and D. Praetorius, “Adaptive FEM with Coarse Initial Mesh Guarantees Optimal Convergence Rates for Compactly Perturbed Elliptic Problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 317, pp. 318–340, 2017.

C. Gao, “Effect of Front Windshield Angle on Drag Coefficient of Electric Vehicles,” Theoret. and Nat. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2023.

S. Vignesh, V. S. Gangad, V. Jishnu, Maheswarreddy, A. Krishna and Y. S. Mukkamala, “Windscreen Angle and Hood Inclination Optimization for Drag Reduction in Cars,” in Proc. Manufactur., pp. 685–692, 2019.

V. Kausalyah, S. Shasthri, K. A. Abdullah, M. M. Idres, Q. H. Shah and S. V. Wong, “Optimisation of Vehicle Front-End Geometry for Adult and Pediatric Pedestrian Protection,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2014.

Y. Mizuno, “Summary of IHRA Pedestrian Safety Working Group Activities (2005) Proposed Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Afforded By Passenger Cars,” Baidu, 2005.

S. Bhattacharya, “Central Composite Design for Response Surface Methodology and Its Application in Pharmacy,” Respon. Surf. Methodol. in Eng. Sci., pp. 1-19, 2021.

V. Kausalyah, M. S. Shafiq and S. Shasthri, “Analysis of The Influence of The Rear End Sedan Vehicle Profile on The Aerodynamic Efficiency,” ARPN J. Eng. and Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1412-1419, 2020.

E. Abo-Serie, A. Gaylard and N. E. Ahmad, “Mesh Optimization for Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics,” CFD Lett., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54-65, 2010.

J. Broniszewski and J. Piechna, “A Fully Coupled Analysis of Unsteady Aerodynamics Impact on Vehicle Dynamics During Braking,” Eng. Appl. Computat. Fluid Mechan., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 623–641, 2019.

A. S. Mahdi Al-Obaidi and L. C. Sun, “Calculation and Optimization of The Aerodynamic Drag of An Open-Wheel Race Car,” EURECA, pp. 29-30, 2013.

M. K. Thompson and J. M. Thompson, “Meshing,” ANSYS Mechanical APDL for Finite Element Analysis, pp. 181–199, Elsevier Science, 2017.